Having used Gnome a bit, one of the features I found much to my liking was the method used to show the progress of file copying. Rather than using a chunky, clutterific progress window, the file’s icon label updates (in real-time) the filesize until the copy is complete. On completion, the filename is displayed as normal.
I think this would be a welcome addition to OS X. A number of the Eazel people who created Nautilus are (back, in some cases) at Apple. They may well have ideas about how to improve this feature, possibly taking advantage of the graphical features of Quartz to give the user additional visual feedback. Perhaps a gradual fade-in of the icon?
I would not advocate using this method in all cases – it is best used ONLY for file copies initiated in the actual file manager. Downloads started from FTP clients or browsers would have no easy way to indicate that a download has begun as requested. This is how it works in Nautilus/Gnome.
Apple appears to be implementing (for Panther) a suggestion of mine (I doubt I am the only one who thought of it) — driving directions from within the Sherlock web services application. What I would like to know is if they will implement the other part of my idea — making those directions available on the iPod…
I have been using Greg Schueler’s CornerClick on my iMac. An interesting implementation of Fitts’ Law. While it is true that the corners of the screen have infinite depth, there are only four of them. Using modifier keys is a good way to expand the manipulation possibilities, but forces the user to remember the key combinations. CornerClick used in conjunction with the upcoming 10.3 release with Expose might greatly alleviate the need to use the Dock.
There was a rumor a while ago about Apple possibly developing a movie equivalent of their iTunes Music Store. These are my thoughts on implementation of such a thing.
- The boogey man of digital media: Digital Rights Management.
- What kind of burning and copying restrictions would Apple place on downloaded movies? Blocking burning altogether would not be a good idea, as many people would have no idea how to hook their computer up to their television. Then how do you display the movie on something larger than a computer screen? The SuperDrive would seem to be the obvious solution. Then comes the question of third-party external burner support… I imagine Apple would only officially support DVD-R drives shipped by themselves, leaving add-on support to OEMs or enterprising users, much like the iTunes CD-R drivers. Three burns per movie?
- Would the movies be transferable to multiple machines as songs are with the iTunes Music Store? A mechanism to authorize movies on multiple machines would seem to be a good idea. The advantage (and dis-advantage, depending on how you look at it) of using the .Mac login/password for authorization is that due to the number of services those can be used to access, they are not something people are going to be willing to give out freely to those they do not know and/or trust.
- Who can access the store: broadband only.
- This would cut off a portion of the potential customer base, but also ensure that movies could be delivered speedily, a boon to both provider and consumer. Modem connections are too easily broken (not to mention slow). Oops, Billy picked up the phone before the last two megabytes of "Plan 9 From Outer Space" finished. I suppose this could be worked around by using a resume feature. Do you really want connection sockets taken up by someone downloading "Ishtar" on a 33.6K modem?
- If done right (reliable, high quality, good selection), such a service may well increase the adoption of broadband (assuming multi-platform availability).
- Fee structuring: who gets the $$?
- What would the pricing model be? Rentals would be welcomed by consumers, but are just not practical from a content-provider standpoint. If the media can be transfered to a computer and played, it can be recorded. A rental model would also limit the possible use of the available SuperDrives for burning to DVD for playback on a home theater system. $10-$15 USD per movie?
- As for the division of the fee, Apple and the studios would have to work that out.
- The Content Itself: Codecs, compatibility, extras.
- What codec would deliver the best quality/size ratio? H.263 is supposed to be quite good (Update 10/27/04: H.264, which will be supported in 10.4, would be better) and is already supported by QuickTime 6.3. In addition to the quality and size considerations, there is the matter of adding DRM atop them.
- Use the Mac market as a testbed or simultaneously release Mac and Windows clients?
- Extra content? Would the file include all the extras included with a DVD or should they be available as a separate, but free download?
- Interface: making it easy to use and as addictive as the iTunes Music Store.
- For movies, a genre browser similar to that available in iTunes would make sense. It would be great to be able to browse by actor, director, or genre.
- Previews - trailers or actual film segments? Using the trailers would best capitalize on Apple's existing movie trailer service.
- Including movies of interviews with those related to the film (director, actors) would add some interest.
- Online reviews available? Professional film reviews or user contributed?
- Meta-data aplenty: Add "tags" for (many that apply to music can also be used to organize movies):
- Personal rating
- Movie poster/art
- Links to the iTunes Music Store where applicable: soundtrack and possibly individual track listings.
- The ability to give a movie credit as a gift (something that has been requested for the iTunes Music Store). There would be too many issues with people being given movies they don't want. There is no easy way to refund them, so a gift certificate would make more sense.
The Complete In A Silent Way Sessions is great as music and as a way of seeing the direction that so many of the musicians involved in the recordings would go on their own. The early sounds of Weather Report (Wayne Shorter and Joe Zawinul), the Mahavishnu Orchestra (John McLaughlin), Chick Corea’s Return to Forever, and Tony Williams’ Lifetime, and Herbie Hancock’s Mwandishi (not to mention Miles Davis’ own groups of the early ’70s) are all heard on these tracks.
Just when you think you have a problem solved (pop-up window navigation), IE6 comes along and screws it up.
Does not seem to want to work. At all. Regardless of syntax.
As for why, it would appear to relate to this securityfocus.com listing. Rather than FIXING it, they disabled the code. FABOO!!
I’d appreciate anyone correcting me if I’m wrong in saying that this is Microsoft’s fault.
According to Apple’s documentation, Safari 1.0 supports the letter-spacing property. Unfortunately, this is one of the tables which Dave Hyatt rightly pointed out as giving a view of breadth, but not of depth. Something about the CSS we are using causes the property to be ignored.
The installation of Safari (version 1.0) on my iMac does not render the text beneath my weblog title in the system cursive font, as specified by my CSS. This is somewhat ironic as my iMac is the machine my weblog is actually on. D’oh.
Other installations of Safari on our home network render it as they should. Very odd. Also, OmniWeb (4.5b3) on my iMac renders it fine! It uses WebCore too, so this is somewhat befuddling.
Safari lacks the detailed font configuration of Mozilla and IE5, making this an irritant of greater size than it should be. I have tried flushing the user and system caches w/Cocktail and resetting Safari, all to no avail. Google searching has revealed nothing as yet.
It appears that Safari does not support the text-decoration property within a span that is set to display: none until hovered (on which it is set to display: block, a la Eric Meyer’s css/edge).
I’ll post the files which revealed this issue in a day or two.
I also have seen some problems with the word-spacing property, which is supported, according to the MacEdition CSS2 support table.
I’m considering purchasing an iSight from Apple using some of the proceeds from both a web coding project and temping. It would be helpful for remote collaboration on web work (my brother lives in the boonies). The reviews I’ve read thus far have been very positive. The only downside most people mention is the current lack of cross-platform conferencing using iChat AV. I believe Apple is using SIP (at least for VoIP), so it should only be a matter of time before some enterprising soul(s) make(s) it happen.