It has been great to watch Sketch evolve from a fairly simple drawing application (DrawIt, originally) to a key part of many digital designers' workflow and the center of a design tool ecosystem. Having been a heavy Fireworks user, I see a lot of it in Sketch.
The Bohemian Coding team was obviously aware of Fireworks and the community around it. One of the first Sketch plugins I knew of was Ale Muñoz's Sketch Commands, which he originally developed for Fireworks. He has since joined the Bohemian team. Bohemian Coding also asked illustrator and designer Isabel Aracama to create a vector illustration showing that Sketch could be used for such things. Prior to its demise, she was a vocal promoter of Fireworks. If you didn't know Fireworks could handle complex vector illustration, check out her work.
Fireworks wasn't just for slicing images. A number of features made it a good tool for designing any pixel-based interface, features that are among those designers coming from Photoshop to Sketch have found particularly welcome.
Flexible Canvas Sizing
Fireworks allowed you to creates pages within your design file of different resolutions. Ultimately, it's not as flexible as the Page > Artboard (or infinite canvas) arrangement in Sketch, but it was a lot more flexible than Photoshop allowed at the time. This made it easy to design different parts of interfaces while having access to the same symbols and styles.
Fireworks allowed you to nest symbols, and scale and style them without affecting other instances. If configured with 9-slice scaling, you could stretch symbols without distorting the areas outside the center slice.
Buttons were a special symbol type in Fireworks, allowing you to create a base button and reuse it with custom label text. Within the symbol, you could create up, down, and hover states.
Rich Symbols were a pain to create, but provided some of the same functionality as Symbol Overrides do in Sketch. The prolific John Dunning wrote some tools to ease the process, but Fireworks was a bit buggy in handling custom Rich Symbols.
If you needed to share your symbols, you could just export a symbol library file.
Plugins (known as Extensions in Fireworks) were an under-promoted feature in Fireworks. As designers find with Sketch, plugins can dramatically increase your efficiency. One of the first plugins I installed whenever I set up Fireworks was John Dunning's QuickFire, which put all the commands of other plugins a few keystrokes away rather than buried in a submenu of the Commands menu, much like Sketch Runner does in Sketch. I used Ale Muñoz's Orange Commands, John Dunning's keyboard resizing commands, and Matt Stow's math resizing commands a lot to improve my workflow.
The Twist and Fade plugin included with Fireworks is similar to Looper for Sketch.
If you are primarily concerned with testing whether a navigation scheme makes sense, simple click-through prototyping is quite useful. It doesn't let you work with user input beyond clicks or transition smoothly between states and views, but it can help you address problems in layout, contrast, and labeling.
In Fireworks, you would draw arbitrary polygonal hotspots or place button symbols, then specify a page within your Fireworks file to which they should point. You couldn't specify a transition (push left, right, cross-fade, etc.); everything just swapped. You could export to HTML (which created an image map) or to a clickable PDF with everything rasterized. The prototyping functionality in the recent v49 release of Sketch is not terribly different, but it represents what Emanuel Sá referred to as “the tip of the iceberg.”
- Fireworks used an extended version of the PNG file format that made for pretty compact files, even with lots of pages. It's certainly not why I chose Fireworks as my design tool, but it was welcome when backing up or working on a machine without tons of memory.
- I miss Fireworks' Auto Shapes sometimes. There are a few in Sketch (star, polygon, arrow, triangle), but Fireworks provided a few more. A former colleague learned how to use Fireworks after seeing how easy it was to redline mockups using the Measure Auto Shape.
- I still miss the ability to simply see the distance between two guides by holding down a modifier key while the cursor is between two guides on the same axis.
- They wouldn't really make sense in Sketch, but Shared Layers were another huge advantage of Fireworks over Photoshop for UI design. These worked a bit like master pages in InDesign. Create a layer (a navigation bar, for instance), then share it to all the pages where it should appear. You could achieve the same basic thing with a symbol, but symbol positions don't carry across instances.
- There was a cool gradient fill type in Fireworks called Satin that could be used to create nice abstract graphics. It would be tough to translate to code (be it CSS or a native UI toolkit), but it would still be great for static graphics.
What Wasn't So Great
- There were stability problems that decreased over the time Adobe developed the product, but it never became rock-solid. Sketch has really improved in this regard.
- No native vector export. John Dunning wrote an extension to export SVG that worked quite well, but no built-in option existed.
- No multi-resolution export. This wasn't a big deal until the iPhone 4 came along with the high-PPI Retina display.
- Text anti-aliasing was always so-so.
- No springs and struts (or constraints, resizing rules, etc.).
I'm glad that David Malouf had adopted Fireworks for the team at my first job working as a designer. It served me well from 2006 until Adobe announced the end of development in 2013. Reading the writing on the wall, I switched to Sketch, even before it had many tools for reuse like symbols and shared styles. If they can just get that guide space measurement feature implemented…
I know there are FPS-inspired shortcuts for assigning resizing constaints to layers in Sketch, but I’d like a way to simply copy those for one layer and paste them onto another.
- The Resizing Constraints commands would appear in the contextual menu when Control-clicking on a layer on the canvas (as depicted) or in the Layers list.
- I like the brevity of the contextual menu that appears when Control-clicking on a shadow in the Inspector. A similarly focused menu for the Resizing section would be nice.
- For those of us who use the keyboard heavily in Sketch, Command-Shift-C and Command-Shift-V to Copy and Paste constraints would be helpful.
- The Copy/Paste Resizing Constraints commands would also be available through the Edit > Paste menu. Reset is already in Layer > Constraints.
- It’s a bit inconsistent that the controls are labeled “Resizing” in the Inspector, “Constraints” in the Layer menu.
I’ve opened a few Sketch documents lately that specify fonts I didn’t have installed. Something like the TypeKit integration in Adobe’s Creative Cloud apps could smooth the process of acquiring missing fonts.
- I think it’s helpful to show the document name in the dialog because you can’t actually see the document open in Sketch yet. Maybe you opened a couple documents at once and aren’t sure which one has missing fonts.
- The Search Web for Font button would only appear if the specified font cannot be found on Google Fonts. Clicking it would open a search engine query (using the default engine in the user’s default web browser) with a string along the lines of “FontName-Weight+font”.
- Alternatively, a menu allowing the user to either search a generic search engine or a font site like FontSquirrel could appear.
- The dialog should be wide enough to accomodate most PostScript font names. Extremely lengthy font names should be truncated in the middle so the user can see the first bit of the family name and the weight. The whole name can be displayed on hover.
- Some variation of this interface should also appear in the Missing Fonts sheet.
I would really like to be able to interact with applications in a simultaneous multi-modal fashion, taking advantage of pointing device, keyboard, voice, and gestures. In some cases, I'd like to direct speech commands to a background app while pointer and keyboard focus remains in the front app. Sometimes you need information from an app, not necessarily to use it.
Say I’m chatting with a friend to schedule dinner next week, but I don’t remember my schedule. Calendar is open and visible in another region of the screen, but it’s showing the current week. Assuming the Mac is always listening for the Siri invocation command, I just say “Hey, Siri, go to next week in Calendar” rather than switching to Calendar, navigating to next week, then switching back to the chat. This scenario is depicted in the video below.
Speedy interpretation of speech commands is crucial to these interactions feeling fluid and natural. Incorporation of a speech co-processor (as with the iMac Pro) allows Macs to always listen for the “Hey, Siri” prompt rather than having to invoke Siri through the menubar item or keyboard shortcut.
If Apple builds a display (still hoping for a 40-inch 8K) to pair with the forthcoming Mac Pro, they should include the dot field hardware that enables Face Unlock on the iPhone X. Provide that on the Mac, but go further by using it to recognize hand gestures made in the space between the user and the display. It could also potentially be useful for those with motor impairments as a way to use blink patterns to execute commands. Maybe it could even be used as a way to translate sign languages to text, without having to wear a special glove.
- Hold up a thumbs up or down, or one or more fingers to star rate the playing song
- Raise or lower your hand to control audio or video volume
- Make a pinch in or out gesture in mid-air to zoom in mapping or graphics apps; not everyone has a trackpad
- Make a “holding a camera, pressing the shutter button” gesture to take a screenshot
I wrote years ago about visual gesture interpretation, for which there now seems to be capable hardware. More recent thoughts on gestural interaction from David Rose and IDEO.
Tools and Resources
The moment I realized I needed to break up with my phone came just over two years ago. I had recently had a baby and was feeding her in a darkened room as she cuddled on my lap. It was an intimate, tender moment — except for one detail. She was gazing at me … and I was on eBay, scrolling through listings for Victorian-era doorknobs.
Say you drag a few images into one of Affinity Photo’s merging tools, only to realize you opened the wrong one. The commands are grouped in the menu, two have keyboard shortcuts right next to one another, and the tools have similar layouts, making this a fairly easy mistake to make.
Rather than having to hit Cancel, open the intended merge tool, then relocate the images you want to merge, what if you could just switch to it, with the images you added still in place?
- The functionality of the Batch tool seems different enough to warrant it remaining separate.
- To keep the various merging options visible to the user, it might be best to keep their individual items in the File menu. Each would just open the unified interface to the appropriate tool.
- It would be great to be able to drag-and-drop directly to the Images pane rather than having to open the file picker, then drop to it, then click OK.
- The visual styling of the window widgets is a bit confusing; the brighter widgets are disabled. This is contrary to most GUI conventions, including how the OK button is disabled in the tools themselves.
- If the Panorama tool isn’t resizable because the panorama previews would have to be re-rendered (a processor-intensive task), just fix the width of the preview pane while allowing the Images pane to expand.
- There is some ambiguity in the Panorama tool when you have stitched multiple panoramas together. If you don't explicitly select all of them in the preview pane before you hit OK, only the last selected one will build. A different button label or counter tallying how many panoramas will be rendered (Render 2 Panoramas) might be sufficient.
- NTH: a way to tell which images constitute which panorama after the panorama preview is generated. This could look something like the mockup below. Ideally, the number displays next to the panorama preview would handle discontiguous stitches nicely, so if you used three of 4 images out of sequence, something like “1 – 2, 4” would appear next to the thumbnail.
- NTH: the “Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters!” portion of the movie theme should play when you check the “Automatically remove ghosts” option in the HDR merge tool.
I'm looking forward to Affinity Publisher!